Leegin's 10-Year Checkup Tips for Advising Clients on RPM

For nearly a century, resale price maintenance was a per se antitrust violation. Then, on June 28, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the legality of RPM should be determined on a case-by-case basis under the rule of reason.

Now that a decade has passed since the landmark ruling in Leegin Creative Leather Products Inc. v. PSKS Inc., this week-long Expert Analysis series examines its impact.

Read More: Leegin's 10-Year Checkup: Tips for Advising Clients on RPM


Download PDF Share Back To Listing
Loading data